Choosing between Clearcue and Trigify comes down to one question: do you want qualified leads with insights, or raw signal data you need to process elsewhere?
Clearcue is the better choice for most B2B sales teams because it delivers AI-qualified leads with research and context, not just raw engagement data. Trigify works best as signal infrastructure for teams already using Clay or similar data platforms who want TrigIQ insights and automation. Clearcue costs less and requires no technical setup.
This comparison breaks down pricing, features, ease of use, and ideal use cases so you can pick the right tool for your team.
Quick Comparison: Clearcue vs Trigify
| Feature |
Clearcue |
Trigify |
| Starting price |
€79/month |
$149/month |
| Signal sources |
LinkedIn, X (Twitter), Reddit, News, Jobs, Podcasts, Events |
LinkedIn, Reddit, forums, YouTube, social/professional networks |
| Signal stacking |
Yes, built-in |
No |
| AI qualification |
Yes, automatic insights on every lead |
TrigIQ for outreach suggestions, automated insights |
| Deep research |
Yes, company and person level |
No, requires external tools |
| Team collaboration |
Yes, shared workspace |
Limited |
| Ease of use |
Very easy, no technical setup |
Moderate, steep learning curve |
| Best for |
Growing sales teams wanting qualified leads |
Technical teams needing LinkedIn data infrastructure |
| Free trial |
Yes |
7-14 days |
Who Should Choose Clearcue
Clearcue is best for sales teams who want to find and qualify warm leads without building complex data pipelines.
Choose Clearcue if you:
- Want qualified leads with context, not just raw signal data
- Need multi-source tracking (LinkedIn, X, News, Jobs, Events, Podcasts)
- Have a small team (1-15 people) without GTM engineers
- Want signal stacking to identify the warmest prospects
- Need AI research on companies and individuals
- Prefer a tool you can set up in 30 minutes and start getting results
Typical Clearcue user: A founder or sales leader at a B2B SaaS startup who wants to find in-market leads without hiring a data team or spending hours on manual research.
Who Should Choose Trigify
Trigify is best for technical teams who need LinkedIn engagement data as an input source for their existing data stack.
Choose Trigify if you:
- Already use Clay, HubSpot, or similar platforms for lead processing
- Have GTM engineers who can build and maintain data workflows
- Want TrigIQ's automated outreach suggestions
- Want raw engagement data to process through your own qualification logic
- Have budget for multiple tools in your signal detection stack
Typical Trigify user: A revenue operations team at a larger company that uses Clay for data enrichment and needs LinkedIn engagement signals as one of many inputs.
Key Differences
1. Signal Sources: Coverage Comparison
Clearcue monitors LinkedIn, X (Twitter), Reddit, news mentions, job postings, podcast appearances, and events from a single dashboard. You see the full picture of buyer intent across channels.
Trigify monitors LinkedIn, Reddit, forums, YouTube, and other social/professional networks. Both tools offer broad coverage, though Clearcue adds news mentions, job postings, podcast appearances, and events.
Example scenario:
- A VP of Sales at your target account posts on LinkedIn about hiring SDRs
- The same person tweets about frustration with their current tools
- Their company announces a funding round in TechCrunch
Clearcue captures all three signals and stacks them on the same profile. Trigify captures the LinkedIn post and can track Reddit/forum activity, but does not include news monitoring or signal stacking.
2. Signal Stacking: Patterns vs Single Actions
Clearcue combines multiple signals on a person or company level into a single view. One action is noise. Patterns are intent. When someone shows 3-4 buying signals, you know they are worth prioritizing.
Trigify shows individual engagement events without connecting them. You see that someone liked a post, but you cannot easily identify prospects showing multiple signals across different triggers.
Why this matters:
A prospect who:
- Attended a sales conference (event signal)
- Complained about competitor pricing (social signal)
- Started hiring SDRs (job signal)
- Liked posts about sales automation (engagement signal)
...is far more likely to respond than someone who only liked one post. Clearcue surfaces these patterns automatically. With Trigify, you would need to export data to Clay or another tool and build custom logic to identify overlapping signals.
3. AI Qualification: Insights vs Raw Data
Clearcue uses AI to qualify and contextualize every signal. You do not just see what someone did. You understand why they matter and what they are likely to do next.
Features include:
- AI signal intelligence that filters alerts to match your criteria
- Deep profile research on any prospect with one click
- Company-level insights showing patterns across multiple contacts
- Automatic qualification so alerts come pre-filtered, not raw
Trigify offers TrigIQ, which generates outreach suggestions based on engagement context. This helps with messaging but does not qualify or prioritize leads. You still get raw signal volume without insight into which leads are actually worth pursuing.
The difference in practice:
With Clearcue: You receive 20 qualified leads per day with context on why each one matters. Your team focuses on outreach.
With Trigify: You receive 200 engagement events per day. Your team spends hours filtering noise, exporting to Clay, enriching data, and building qualification logic before knowing which leads to prioritize.
4. Ease of Use: Ready to Go vs Infrastructure Project
Clearcue is designed for sales teams without technical resources. Setup takes under 30 minutes. Define your signals, connect Slack or your CRM, and start receiving qualified leads.
Trigify requires more technical investment. The platform works best when connected to Clay, HubSpot, or similar tools for data processing. Building effective workflows takes days or weeks, and maintaining them requires ongoing attention.
User feedback pattern:
Trigify users frequently mention:
- Steep learning curve
- Template-based signals work, but custom signals are difficult
- Best used as infrastructure, not a standalone solution
- Need to connect additional tools for full value
Clearcue users report:
- Setup in under 30 minutes
- No technical background needed
- Works as a complete solution without additional tools
- Team can collaborate without training
5. Pricing: Value vs Volume
Clearcue offers more value at a lower price point.
Clearcue pricing:
- Starter: €79/month
- 7 signal rules: €99/month (unlimited leads)
- 25 signal rules: €250/month (unlimited leads)
- 75 signal rules: €500/month (unlimited leads)
Trigify pricing:
- Essential: $149/month (5 profiles tracked)
- Growth: $270/month (10 profiles tracked)
- Scale: $549/month (20 profiles tracked)
- Enterprise: Custom pricing
Key pricing differences:
- Clearcue is cheaper to start: €79/month vs $149/month
- Clearcue does not limit leads found: You pay for signal rules, not output volume. Smart signals generate unlimited qualified leads.
- Trigify limits profiles tracked: At $149/month, you can only track 5 profiles. Scaling requires significant budget increases.
- Clearcue includes AI features: Research, qualification, and insights are included. Trigify offers TrigIQ for outreach suggestions and automated insights.
- Total cost of ownership: Trigify often requires Clay ($149-800/month) or similar tools to process data, increasing true cost significantly.
Cost comparison for a typical use case:
Finding and qualifying 50 warm leads per month:
- Clearcue: €99/month (complete solution)
- Trigify + Clay: $149 + $349 = $498/month minimum
6. Team Collaboration: Built-In vs Workarounds
Clearcue includes team collaboration features. Multiple team members can access the same workspace, share signals, assign leads, and run coordinated outreach without stepping on each other.
Trigify is designed more for individual users or technical operators. Team collaboration requires exporting data to shared tools like HubSpot or building custom workflows.
For growing teams:
Clearcue scales naturally as you add team members. Everyone sees the same qualified leads, research is shared, and handoffs are clean.
Trigify requires additional infrastructure investment to support team workflows. Most teams end up building custom processes in Clay or their CRM to coordinate.
Feature Comparison Table
| Capability |
Clearcue |
Trigify |
| LinkedIn signal tracking |
✓ |
✓ |
| X (Twitter) signal tracking |
✓ |
✗ |
| Reddit signal tracking |
✓ |
✓ |
| News monitoring |
✓ |
✗ |
| Job posting tracking |
✓ |
✗ |
| Podcast mention tracking |
✓ |
✗ |
| Event attendance tracking |
✓ |
✗ |
| Signal stacking |
✓ |
✗ |
| AI lead qualification |
✓ |
Limited |
| Deep profile research |
✓ |
✗ |
| Company-level insights |
✓ |
✗ |
| Living audiences (auto-update) |
✓ |
✗ |
| Slack integration |
✓ |
✓ |
| HubSpot integration |
✓ |
✓ |
| Clay integration |
✓ |
✓ |
| Webhook support |
✓ |
✓ |
| Team collaboration |
✓ |
Limited |
| No-code setup |
✓ |
Partial |
Common Questions
Is Trigify good for small teams?
Trigify can work for small teams, but the learning curve and need for additional tools make it challenging. Small teams typically get better results with Clearcue because it delivers qualified leads without requiring technical setup or data engineering.
Can I use Trigify without Clay?
Yes, but you lose significant value. Trigify works best as a data source feeding into Clay or similar platforms. Using Trigify standalone means working with raw engagement data without enrichment, qualification, or advanced filtering.
Does Clearcue replace Trigify and Clay together?
For most use cases, yes. Clearcue combines signal detection, data enrichment, AI qualification, and research in one platform. Teams using Trigify + Clay for LinkedIn intent tracking can typically consolidate to Clearcue and reduce both cost and complexity.
Clearcue focuses on qualified signals rather than volume. The AI filters noise and surfaces leads worth pursuing. Trigify provides raw engagement data, which includes both valuable signals and noise. Data quality depends on how much processing you do after extraction.
Can I switch from Trigify to Clearcue?
Yes. Most teams complete the switch in under a day. Export your tracked profiles from Trigify, set up equivalent signals in Clearcue, and connect your integrations. Clearcue's simpler setup means you spend less time on configuration and more time on outreach.
Verdict: Clearcue Wins for Most Teams
Clearcue is the better choice for B2B sales teams who want qualified leads with insights, not raw data requiring additional processing.
Choose Clearcue if you want:
- Qualified leads, not just signal volume
- Multi-source tracking beyond LinkedIn
- Signal stacking to find the warmest prospects
- AI research and insights built in
- Simple setup without technical resources
- Lower total cost of ownership
Choose Trigify if you:
- Already have Clay and want signal data as one input source
- Have GTM engineers to build and maintain workflows
- Want TrigIQ's automated outreach suggestions
- Prefer raw data you control and process yourself
For most growing B2B teams, Clearcue delivers better results at lower cost with less complexity. Try Clearcue free and see qualified leads in your first session.
Real-World Use Case Comparison
Understanding how each tool performs in practice helps clarify the difference.
Scenario: Finding Prospects Interested in Sales Automation
Your goal: Find B2B SaaS companies showing intent to buy sales automation tools.
With Clearcue:
- Create a signal rule: "People engaging with sales automation content"
- Add filters: B2B SaaS, 50-500 employees, VP/Director level
- Enable signal stacking to prioritize prospects with multiple signals
- Clearcue monitors LinkedIn, X, news, jobs, and events automatically
- AI qualifies each lead and adds research context
- You receive 15-25 qualified leads daily in Slack with full context
- Time to first lead: Same day
With Trigify:
- Create engagement tracking for sales automation influencers
- Set up profile tracking for target accounts (limited by plan)
- Export engagement data to Clay
- Build Clay workflow to enrich contacts
- Create qualification logic in Clay
- Set up scoring to prioritize leads
- Configure alerts for high-scoring prospects
- You receive raw engagement data requiring manual review
- Time to first qualified lead: 1-2 weeks of setup
The difference is not just time. Clearcue delivers context that helps you write better outreach. Trigify delivers data points that require interpretation.
Scenario: Tracking Competitor Mentions
Your goal: Find people complaining about competitor tools.
With Clearcue:
- Create signal: "Complaining about [Competitor Name]"
- Select sources: LinkedIn, X, Reddit
- AI identifies complaint sentiment automatically
- Receive alerts when prospects express frustration
- Research feature shows full context of the complaint
- You reach out with relevant, empathetic messaging
With Trigify:
- Track competitor company pages on LinkedIn and Reddit
- Monitor engagers on competitor posts
- Use smart workflows to automate data processing
- Export to Clay for sentiment analysis if needed
- Use TrigIQ for outreach suggestions
- Manually review results to identify actual complaints
Clearcue captures multi-platform complaints with built-in sentiment understanding and AI qualification. Trigify captures engagement across LinkedIn, Reddit, and forums with TrigIQ outreach suggestions.
Integration Comparison
Both tools integrate with common sales and marketing platforms, but the integration experience differs.
Clearcue Integrations
Clearcue connects natively with:
- Slack (rich notifications with full lead context)
- HubSpot (sync leads and signals to CRM)
- Clay (send qualified leads for additional enrichment if needed)
- HeyReach (automated LinkedIn outreach)
- Lemlist (email sequences)
- Instantly (cold email at scale)
- Webhooks (custom integrations with any platform)
Integrations work out of the box. Connect your accounts, select what data to sync, and signals flow automatically with full context preserved.
Trigify Integrations
Trigify connects with:
- HubSpot
- Salesforce
- Clay
- Smartlead
- Slack
- Webhooks
Integrations focus on data export rather than enriched lead delivery. You receive engagement events that require processing in the destination platform.
Key difference: Clearcue integrations deliver qualified leads with context. Trigify integrations deliver raw events for processing.
Migration: Switching from Trigify to Clearcue
If you are currently using Trigify and considering a switch, here is what to expect.
What You Keep
- Your understanding of which signals matter
- Your target account lists (export and reimport)
- Your integration connections (reconnect to same platforms)
What Changes
- Simpler signal setup (no need for complex configurations)
- Multi-source coverage (signals beyond LinkedIn)
- Built-in qualification (no Clay dependency)
- Lower monthly cost
- Faster time to qualified leads
Migration Steps
- Export your tracked profiles from Trigify
- Sign up for Clearcue free trial
- Create equivalent signals in Clearcue (typically takes 30 minutes)
- Import target accounts if desired
- Connect Slack and CRM integrations
- Start receiving qualified leads immediately
Most teams complete migration in a single afternoon. The time saved on ongoing workflow maintenance pays back the migration effort within the first week.
Support and Onboarding
Getting started quickly and getting help when stuck matters for productivity.
Clearcue Support
- Self-serve onboarding (most users set up in under 30 minutes)
- In-app guidance for signal creation
- Email support with fast response times
- Documentation and tutorials
Most Clearcue users never need support because the product is intuitive. When questions arise, responses are quick and helpful.
Trigify Support
- Onboarding requires more guidance due to complexity
- Documentation for technical setup
- Email and chat support
- Community resources
Trigify's complexity means more users need support during setup. Getting full value requires understanding how to connect with Clay and build effective workflows.
Summary: Clearcue vs Trigify at a Glance
| Dimension |
Clearcue |
Trigify |
| Core strength |
Qualified leads with insights |
Signal data infrastructure |
| Signal sources |
7+ (LinkedIn, X, Reddit, News, Jobs, Podcasts, Events) |
Multiple (LinkedIn, Reddit, forums, YouTube, social networks) |
| AI capabilities |
Qualification, research, insights |
TrigIQ outreach suggestions, automated insights |
| Setup time |
30 minutes |
Days to weeks |
| Requires other tools |
No |
Yes (Clay recommended) |
| Starting price |
€79/month |
$149/month |
| Best for |
Sales teams wanting results |
Technical teams building data pipelines |
| Team collaboration |
Built-in |
Requires workarounds |
Try Clearcue Today
Stop spending hours processing raw signal data. Clearcue watches the internet and delivers qualified leads with the context you need to start meaningful conversations.
- Set up in under 30 minutes
- See qualified leads on day one
- No technical expertise required
- Multi-source signals, AI qualification, and deep research included
Start your free trial and find your next customers before your competitors do.